News organizations concerned about access issues at the Obama White House

Representatives from Obama’s press office held a conference call with photo editors, who are concerned that the administration prefers distributing photos taken by a White House photographer in cases where photojournalists have been permitted access in the past…

…Television network bureau chiefs also protested the exclusion of video cameras from the second oath of office…

…Four reporters witnessed the oath of office and shared their observations with others, and a White House photo was released.

“We think it was done in a way that was upfront and transparent,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a briefing when questioned why video cameras were not present.

What goes around, comes around. How enamored are the media with their messiah now?

Republished in full, from our email Inbox this morning. (All emphasis added, formatting for clarity only)

““““““““““““`
Abridged letter from Troy Clarke, President of General Motors - followed by a response from our son, Gregory Knox:

Dear Employee,

Next week, Congress and the current Administration will determine whether to provide immediate support to the domestic auto industry to help it through one of the most difficult economic times in our nation’s history. Your elected officials must hear from all of us now on why this support is critical to our continuing the progress we began prior to the global financial crisis……………….

As an employee, you have a lot at stake and continue to be one of our most effective and passionate voices. I know GM can count on you to have your voice heard.

Thank you for your urgent action and ongoing support.

Troy Clarke President General Motors North America

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Gregory Knox,

In response to your request to call legislators and ask for a bailout for the United States automakers please consider the following, and please also pass this onto Troy Clark, the president of General Motors North America for me.

You are both infected with the same entitlement mentality that has bred like cancerous germs in UAW halls for the last countless decades, and whose plague is now sweeping the nation, awaiting our new “messiah” to wave his magical wand and make all our problems go away, while at the same time allowing our once great nation to keep “living the dream”.

The dream is over!

The dream that we can ignore the consumer for years while management myopically focuses on its personal rewards packages, at the same time that our factories have been filled with the worlds most overpaid, arrogant, ignorant and laziest entitlement minded “laborers”, without paying the price for these atrocities and dreaming that still the masses will line up to buy our products

Don’t tell me I’m wrong. Don’t accuse me of not knowing of what I speak. I have called on Ford, GM, Chrysler, TRW, Delphi, Kelsey Hayes, American Axle and countless other automotive OEM’s and Tier ones for 3 decades now throughout the Midwest and what I’ve seen over the years in these union shops can only be described as disgusting.

Mr Clark, the president of General Motors, states:

“There is widespread sentiment in this country, in our government, and especially in the media that the current crisis is completely the result of bad management. It is not.”

You’re right - it’s not JUST management. How about the electricians who walk around the plants like lords in feudal times, making people wait on them for countless hours while they drag ass so they can come in on the weekend and make double and triple time for a job they easily could have done within their normal 40-hour week?

How about the line workers who threaten newbies with all kinds of scare tactics for putting out too many parts on a shift and for being too productive (mustn’t expose the lazy bums who have been getting overpaid for decades for their horrific underproduction, must we)? Do you really not know about this stuff?

How about this great sentiment abridged from Mr. Clarke’s sad plea:

“Over the last few years, we have closed the quality and efficiency gaps with our competitors.”

What the hell has Detroit been doing for the last 40 years?!?

Did we really JUST wake up to the gaps in quality and efficiency between us and them?

The K car vs. the Accord?

The Pinto vs. the Civic?

Do I need to go on?

We are living through the inevitable outcome of the actions of the United States auto industry for decades.

Time to pay for your sins, Detroit …

I attended an economic summit last week where a brilliant economist, Alan Beaulieu surprised the crowd when he said he would not have given the banks a penny of “bailout money”. Yes, he said, this would cause short term problems, but despite what people like George Bush and Troy Clark would have us believe, the sun would in fact rise the next day. And something else would happen. Where there had been greedy and sloppy banks new efficient ones would pop up. That is how a free market system works. It does work . . . .if we would let it work.
But for some reason we are now deciding that the rest of the world is right and that capitalism doesn’t work - that we need the government to step in and “save us”. Save us? Hell, we’re nationalizing. And unfortunately, too many of this once fine nation’s citizens don’t even have a clue that this is what’s really happening. But they sure can tell you the stats on their favorite sports teams. Yeah - THAT’S important.

Does it occur to ANYONE that the “competition” has been producing vehicles, EXTREMELY PROFITABLY, for decades now in this country?….

How can that be???

Let’s see:

* Fuel efficient

* Listening to customers

* Investing in the proper tooling and automation for the long haul

* Not being too complacent or arrogant to listen to Dr W Edwards Deming four decades ago

* Ever-increasing productivity through quality, learning and six-sigma plans

* Treating vendors like strategic partners, rather than like “the enemy”

* Efficient front and back offices

* Non-union environment.

Again, I could go on and on but I really wouldn’t be telling anyone anything they really don’t already know in their hearts. I have six children, so I am not unfamiliar with the concept of wanting someone to bail you out of a mess that you have gotten yourself into - my children do this on a weekly, if not daily basis, as I did at their age. I do for them what my parents did for me (one of their greatest gifts, by the way) - I make them stand on their own two feet and accept the consequences of their actions and work them through. Radical concept, huh.

Am I there for them in the wings? Of course - but only until such time as they can be fully on their own as adults. I don’t want to oversimplify a complex situation, but there certainly are unmistakable parallels here between the proper role of parenting and government.

Detroit and the United States need to pay for their sins. Bad news people - it’s coming whether we like it or not

The newly elected Messiah really doesn’t have a magic wand big enough to “make it all go away”. I laughed as I heard Obama “reeling it back in” almost immediately after the vote count was tallied. “We might not do it in a year.or in four.” Where was that kind of talk when he was RUNNING for the office.

Stop trying to put off the inevitable. That house in Florida isn’t worth $750,000.

People who jump across a border really don’t deserve free health care and welfare benefits.

That job driving a forklift for the big 3 really isn’t worth $85,000 a year.

We really shouldn’t allow Wal-Mart to stock their shelves with products acquired from a country that unfairly manipulates their currency and has the most atrocious human rights infractions on the face of the globe.

That couple whose combined annual income is less than $50,000 really shouldn’t be living in that $485,000 home.

Let the market correct itself people - it will. Yes it will be painful, but it’s gonna be painful either way. And the bright side of my proposal is that on the other side of the pain is a nation that appreciates what it has, doesn’t live beyond its means, gets back to basics, and redevelops the work ethic that made it the greatest nation in the history of the world, and probably turns back to God.

Sorry - don’t cut my head off. I’m just the messenger sharing with you the “bad news”.

Gregory J Knox
President
Knox Machinery, Inc.
Franklin, Ohio 45005

I received the following email today from Citizens Against Government Waste; all emphasis is added:

The HillaryCare proponents in Congress are making good on their campaign promise!

Under the guise of helping children without health insurance, the advocates of a government-run, universal healthcare system for all Americans are pushing for a massive expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) - increasing the cost of this program to you, me, and all taxpayers

If they succeed, this would be a giant first step toward making their vision of a socialist, Canadian-style healthcare system a reality in this country.

The House and Senate will consider legislation on SCHIP as early as next week, and it’s urgent that you tell your Senators and Representative to oppose the expansion of SCHIP and the tax increases that would be required to pay for it.

SCHIP was originally designed to help low-income families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid gain access to health insurance for their children. The proposals being pushed by the HillaryCare advocates would increase the SCHIP income eligibility level from the current 200 percent of the federal poverty line (approx. $40,000 in annual income for a family of four) to 300 or even 400 percent of the federal poverty line (approx. $61,950 and $82,600 in annual income, respectively); might allow states to expand coverage even further to other individuals; and might even increase existing benefits to a practically unlimited benefits package.

These proposals could triple spending on SCHIP, from $25 billion to as much as $75 billion over five years, and make more than 71 percent of American children - including many who already have private insurance - covered under either SCHIP or Medicaid.

To pay for this big-government healthcare expansion, its advocates have proposed increasing the federal cigarette excise tax by as much as 156 percent and raising taxes elsewhere. Trust me, this will be just the first of many tax increases to come as SCHIP, like virtually every other entitlement program before it, ends up costing more than expected and sucking up increasing amounts of your tax dollars!

[A]fter the failure of HillaryCare in the 1990’s, the universal healthcare proponents have wised up. They know they can’t impose a government takeover of America’s healthcare system - and the massive tax increases needed to pay for it - all at once without provoking a resounding public outcry. Instead, they’ve adopted an incremental approach, where they will slowly expand existing government healthcare programs until they crowd out private insurance.

The backers of this plan think they can get all Americans dependent on the government for our healthcare before we know what hit us!

Please tell your Senators and Representative to oppose legislation that would expand SCHIP and increase the federal cigarette excise tax, or any other taxes, to pay for it.

Sincerely,

Thomas A. Schatz
President

Socialized medicine, by focusing solely on the patients - who, of course, should be the PRIMARY focus - makes no allowance for research and development. R&D is VERY expensive and is currently funded by the profits made by privately owned medical facilities. The U.S. has been the world leader in medical research because our capitalist system makes this very expensive R&D profitable which, besides being good for the patients, is good for the economy.

Socialized medicine strangles R&D. Countries with socialized medicine just ride on the coattails of the U.S. If we also socialize medicine on whose coattails will we ride?

Economic crisis notwithstanding, the U.S. is a wealthy enough country to provide medical care for its people - ALL of its people. The best way to ensure that the poor and uninsured get care is to provide, not a medical system funded and controlled by a government with limited resources, but an insurance program that allows them to get care in the privately owned system.

Don’t miss this very important point - truly socialized medicine does not allow competition by private businesses. They sign up for the government program or they shut their doors. Socialized medicine equalizes healthcare, not by raising the standard of care overall, but by lowering it overall, to the lowest common denominator. It takes away the basic right to choose from whom we get our health care. It will be from the government program or not at all.

Is that really the direction we want to take? Do we want to leave our children a country with third rate medical care and crushing entitlement spending?

I don’t.

In California the just-passed proposition amending the constitution to allow gays to marry has met with stiff resistance from backwards religious conservatives.

Anti-gay extremists have assaulted a college freshman for wearing an anti-gay marriage T-shirt. The girl suffered a concussion.

A gay marriage supporter was arrested at an anti-gay rally for wearing a T-shirt saying “Gay marriage - Yes!” The gay-hating crowd was so enraged by the blatant racism that the police told the gay marriage supporter to leave in order to keep the peace. He was arrested when he refused.

An eighth grade girl bravely wore a pro-gay marriage shirt to her conservative school and was verbally assaulted all day - called stupid, told she shouldn’t be wearing a shirt like that, even told to “go die!”

Anti-gay bigots have even targeted individual businesses for demonstrations and boycotts because they supported the gay marriage amendment.

This is tolerance? This censorship and lack of respect for diversity?

Aren’t we all hurt, isn’t our entire political system hurt, when citizens are not free to express their opinions…without fear of tribunal, intimidation and boycott? Aren’t we all threatened when purity of orthodoxy…becomes a requirement for social inclusion?

The stage is being set … for intolerance.

A friend of mine E-mailed me that

“…president Bush’s socializing of the
failing banks was just Socialism Lite, and as such is a problem for America
and for the Republican party.”

Quite frankly, if there were a political solution to the (attitudinal-disunity)
spiritual problems confronting us today, we’d have found the answer long ago…

But I see the underlying disunity as crippling to America… people unable or unwilling
to UNITE on larger ideals and work backward to a mutually-acceptable action,
leads to the fractured, ignorant state we observe today.

Republicans, RINO, Paullians, libertarians, Greens, neo-conservatives
…and…
PUMA-Democrats, Marxists, Democrats, left-leaning liberals, crazed LLL, Koslings…

I’ve tested the waters at a couple blogs, re: New Party, and there’s
some-but-little support for such an idea. Pitting this Part against that Part
is no longer the way to lead/conduct a nation.

In addition, Obama and his lying, dissembling friends appear to be preparing
to go for the jugular, with fistfulls of Executive Orders being prepared for Day 1,
as if Executive Orders are all he needs to “RULE” America!

I am no less disturbed today than when I wrote that Constitutional essay:
We (Americans) have become the people our parents warned us against!
(and my father fought in Europe & Korea to defend us against, and I fought in Korea
to defend us against!) How can we, today, PROTECT the Constitution from
the Obama-Change team?

With free speech stifled, and no independent reporting media,
the Happy Learning Camps are only weeks away.

“You MUST learn to be sensitive
to the feewings of others! You MUST put the greater good above all else!
There are NO INDIVIDUALS at Camp Happy Learning! None! THAT type of thinking
got us into these terrible problems in the first place! Conform!”

Where have we seen THAT before?

G

/for more on What Ails Republicans, click here.

The photo below captures a disturbing trend that is beginning to affect wildlife in the US .

Animals that were formerly self-sufficient are now showing signs of belonging to the Democratic Party…
as they have apparently learned to just sit and wait for the government to step in and provide
for their care and sustenance. This photo is of a Democrat black bear in Montana nicknamed …

‘Bearack Obama’

Presidential candidate Barack Obama is touting a health care reform plan that sounds very familiar. It includes:

The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform plan “expanded the state’s Medicaid program, offered qualified residents financial assistance to purchase insurance, created a new state agency to connect residents with affordable plans and - perhaps the most talked-about change - required all residents with access to affordable coverage to enroll in a plan or incur financial penalties. For employers with more than 10 employees, the law requires that those who do not make a “fair and reasonable” contribution toward worker health coverage, pay up to $295 per employee per year into a state fund.”

And how is that plan working out for Massachusetts?

Well, strictly in terms of coercing encouraging people to get insurance it has been a great success.

Among adults with incomes below 300 percent of the poverty level, the study found uninsurance dropped by almost 11 percentage points, and among adults at less than 100 percent of the poverty level - those eligible for fully subsidized coverage - uninsurance rates dropped by more than two-thirds.

That’s pretty impressive. At least until you compare it to the problems the plan is facing:

And the future is looking a little scary:

The only REAL solution to the health care crisis is to allow the free market to work freely.

Get employers out of the equation - there is NO reason why we should be limited to whatever few (often inferior) healthcare plans are offered by our employers. There is NO reason why our employers should be held responsible for our health insurance (think of it this way…would it make sense for your only affordable option for car insurance to be whatever two or three plans your employer signs up for? Giving you NO choices regarding the amount of your deductible, the amount of coverage, or the areas of coverage, and therefore NO choice regarding the amount of the premium or the reputation of the insurance company?)

Under the current system doctors and patients alike are held hostage by the insurance company, who really calls all the shots. Under universal health care doctors and patients are held hostage by the government, who would really call all the shots. Only in a truly free relationship, where patients can choose their own medical plans, their own doctors, their own course of care, and how much they are willing to pay for it, and where doctors make their medical choices based on what is best for their patients, where they can choose how many patients to care for and what to charge for their services, can the market truly work as it’s supposed to.

Certainly there should be regulations to protect patients from unscrupulous doctors, standards for medical care, and safety nets for the needy. But those objectives can be achieved without creating another government behemoth that will inevitably go the same route as Social Security and Medicare into an unaffordable and unwieldy money pit that is the epitome of inefficiency.